As of January 15, the stimulus package was $825 billion in total. So how do you gain support for such a high priced package? First if you’re in the media you paint the candidate of your choice to be a Godsend, they did that; second, you paint the opposing side as the guilty party responsible for your problems, and help get your candidate elected. Now if you are a member of the elected party you tell the people what they want to hear and ask them to bear with you during these hard times. Once you have hypnotized the people into fear and gotten them to believe your way is the only way, the blank check handed to the government becomes a sacrifice that just has to be made, and big government suddenly becomes a good thing.
President Obama said, “…you get the argument, "Well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill." What do you think a stimulus is? That's the whole point. Don't come to the table with the same tired arguments and worn ideas that helped to create this crisis.” “Same tired arguments and worn ideas that helped to create the crisis,” said the Democratic president. Does President Obama recall that the head of the Federal Reserve in 1979 (you know when the groundwork for our problems started) contributed to the significant recession the U.S. economy experienced in the early 1980s, which included the highest unemployment levels since the Great Depression? Paul Volcker is that man, and he is also the reason for the strongest political attacks and most wide-spread protests in the history of the Federal Reserve. Today Paul Volcker has been appointed by President Obama and named chairman of the newly formed Economic Recovery Advisory Board.
Republican governors say this deal is needed, as Florida Gov. Charlie Crist told MSNBC, “It comes at a time when we need it. People need jobs. It's about jobs, jobs, jobs.” But of course governors want it, it means money for their state because they don’t have any or just want more to add to what they’re not using.
NBC’s Brian Williams says if it saves jobs let’s do it, but does it really? The President talks a lot about rebuilding highways, bridges, schools, hospitals, as well as creating new ones. But as RNC Chairman Michael Steele pointed out on ABC’s This Week, “this administration is talking about…making work. It is creating work…it's not a job. A job is something that a business owner creates. It's going to be long term. If you got a government contract…there's no guarantee that there's going to be more work when you're done with that job.”
Sen. John McCain said a similar thing, “We've got to stimulate the economy and jobs. We're losing sight of what the stimulus is all about, and that is job creation. If it doesn't create jobs, then it's just another spending project.”
No matter what Democrats our Republicans say, the package does not ensure a permanent job; it’s not a career, its paid work that is temporary. Now at least being paid might sound good to someone who is unemployed, but it would only be a matter of time before you were out looking for work again. And if all the roads have been repaved, all the bridges repaired, and all the new hospitals and schools created or rebuilt, what work is there? So what is the government going to do when Americans find themselves out of work again? And on top of all of this you have to first believe that you will even receive work to do, not to mention that just because this package is signed into motion doesn’t means you will suddenly have a job tomorrow.
In its current form the plan gives $43 billion for increased unemployment benefits and job training. Well what good is improving job training when businesses can’t afford to hire? The government would be spending billions to prepare you for a job you can’t get.
In 1993 unemployment was around the same rate as today, but President Bill Clinton’s stimulus plan only cost $16 billion in spending. So say $16-30 billion could help this country, and you take $16-30 billion out of at least $825 billion, you would have $809 billion or less left. And whatever isn’t going to “job creation” or helping the unemployed is going to fulfill the wish list Democrats have been putting together for quite some time. The spending the Democrats want to do could indeed help this country but shouldn’t be on the list right now - there is no money for it!
To sound less selfish or sneaky, Democrats say tax cuts. And tax cuts are a good thing, because than Americans keep more of their hard earned money and can spend. Tax cuts to small or big businesses mean they have more money and they build up and can even take on more workers. But tax cuts are not a good thing when you’re government adds a an extra trillion to the national debt, the same government that criticized the last one for the huge deficit – hypocrites. The government needs money and they’re going to come to you.
President Obama says he wants to help give money back to the American taxpayers. Well right now this bill will cost each and every household $6,700+ in additional debt, paid for by our children and grandchildren. So any money given now would have to be taken out in taxes, because the government just signed an $800+ billion into law. And if businesses can’t afford to hire, and people can’t find work, and the government increases unemployment benefits, we will eventually find ourselves in a hole that we can not get out of. This is the only shovel ready project that is ready to go and it’s not one of the good ones.
The current form(s) of this bill pleases the majority of only one party. We can not spend our way out of this one. This bill does nothing that puts more money into the pockets of Americans. They may tell us it does, but first they have to believe that Americans aren’t going to put that money aside and save it.
If anything this recovery package makes us more dependent on the government, because the government will be giving us money they don’t have. And how can we pay off our debt when we have to borrow more than a trillion dollars?
During the election season Barack Obama said he wanted to reduce the deficit, and last October it was reported that the deficit would reach $455 billion. Obama has certainly not reduced it. And to top it all off during the final presidential debate he said, “I don’t mind paying a little more (taxes).” That’s easy to say when you’re running for president, how can he expect more out of us when we have a hard enough time paying them ourselves? Maybe he should first get the members of his own administration to pay theirs’.
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel said on NBC’s Meet the Press, “…we have got to…get banks again lending to both consumers and businesses.” Again, its money we don’t have, not to mention that fact that lending to people who shouldn’t be taking out loans from banks, who are receiving money from a government in debt, is not a good thing. And it is what got us into this mess in the first place.
So, can we accept this deal? Unemployment would increase, businesses would continue to fail, and future generations would be stuck paying off our debt. So far the only change from this adminstration is the change in Americans' pockets and accounts going to the government. President Thomas Jefferson said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.”
No comments:
Post a Comment